ChatGPT and the trolley problem, why didn't I think of it myself? The Trolley problem is a moral-philosophical mental game, where a person steers a carriage/trolley and must set the switches, depending upon how one sets the switch, gives a consequence, this consequence must be able to weigh in the best case fast. Gladly this is treated in the area of ethics and morals.
Due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence, this has far-reaching consequences for humanity, the likes of which we have never experienced before at such a speed. Within weeks to months, virtually anyone with access to the Internet can now use artificial intelligence to achieve their goals.
Using ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), I created a Lex Kirpeit/AI2023, and adjusted measures accordingly (ChatGPT suggested death penalty, which I think is overkill), which states what limitations of generative AI should apply in my opinion and experience. Since I am a natural person and do not have legislative influence, this Lex Kirpeit/AI2023, is a recommendation and should be considered an informal guide to dealing with generative AI.
This lex is not legally binding, but should be considered to limit long-term harm from generative AIs.
ChatGPT's conclusion:
It is my hope that the Lex Kirpeit/AI2023 will help ensure that the use of generative AI technology is done in an ethically responsible manner and that humanity is protected from the potential harms of the use of AI technology.
I love using AI and see the benefits every day in my day-to-day work to make my job easier, but not always uncritically, so I have to debug code more often, but it's nicely formatted and documented right away. But generative AI is a danger. Continue reading →
English 
German 
French 
Czech